Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Tommy Jones v. Bernard Clement, et al
as 17-5331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY EARL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD CLEMENT, M.D., AMY BOWEN, N.P., GEORGIA CROWELL, H.C.A. and others
Loudermilk v. Reese et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chad Loudermilk
Defendant:
Jessica Reece, City of Dayton Tennessee, Rhea County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross v. Chester et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ronald Reece Cross
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Chester and (f/n/u) Nwozo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westfield Insurance Company v. Estate of Arthur Gene McMahan, Jr. et al
as 3:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Estate of Arthur Gene McMahan, Jr., Estate of Melissa Renee Desimone McMahan, Estate of Anthony J. Reece and others
Counter_claimant:
Estate of Anthony J. Reece and Estate of Tammy Renee Reece
Counter_defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
James Reece v. L. Whitley, et al
as 16-6793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
L. RAY WHITLEY, CHRIS VINES, WILLIAM LAMBERTH and others
Ibanez v. Ogunbiyi et al
as 2:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Ibanez
Defendant:
Bayo Ogunbiyi, Will Williams, Ms. Roxy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Crowell et al (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant:
Georgia Crowell, Rita Reece and Amy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Crowell et al
as 2:2016mc00008
Plaintiff:
Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant:
Georgia Crowell, Rita Reece and Amy Bowen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
