Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,056
Rutan v. Cast et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff: Jon Paul Rutan
Defendant: Marney Cast, Abe Dane, Brent Leininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kaplan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Scott Kaplan
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Rewerts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11212
Plaintiff: Darcy Montel Scott
Defendant: Randee Rewerts and Ward
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00812
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hoseth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff: Scott Arthur Hoseth
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor: Kendra Feltner
Defendant: Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff: Shane J Hardymon
Defendant: Scott Kent and Michael P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mensen v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff: Scott Mensen
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Ralph E. Isham
Defendant: Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?