Cases 61 - 70 of 506
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hale v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 4:2022cv10300
Plaintiff:
Venetta Hale
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Princiera Wilson, Amber Harris and others
Dan Hale, et al v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 21-6253
Plaintiff:
DAN E. HALE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DON HALE, Individually, and as Trustee for the HRC Medical Defined Benefit Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel., HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General and Reporter and HOGDEN MAINDA
Hale v. Johnson
as 3:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Hale v. Morgan Stanley
as 21-4184
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD "RIP" HALE
Respondent / Appellee:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, dba Morgan Stanley Wealth Management
Hale v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05525
Plaintiff:
Shannon K Hale
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Angela Paige Fisher
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, Department of Community Based Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
