Cases 61 - 70 of 81
United States of America et al v. Mount Clemens Regional Medical Center et al
as 2:2011cv12844
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Robert Koss
Defendant:
Mount Clemens Regional Medical Center, Daniel Cozadd, Richard Reidy and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durr v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00347
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Jeffrey Utter, James S. Haralson and others
Plaintiff:
Kamar Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Clemen Tarpley
as 10-8048
Debtor:
In re: CLEMEN DALE TARPLEY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CLEMEN DALE TARPLEY
Mount Clemens Investment Group, LLC v. Borman's, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv12679
Defendant:
Borman's, Inc. and The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mount Clemens Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. USA et al
as 6:2010cv00167
Petitioner:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Respondent:
USA, Harley G. Lappin, Donald L. Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdel Eltayib v. Stephen Dewalt, et al
as 09-6040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDEL ELTAYIB
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden, HARLEY LAPPAN, Regional Director, KIMBERLY WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Turk et al v. Oiler et al
as 1:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Turk and Marybeth Turk
Defendant:
Brian Oiler, Adam Rabak, Frank Nosal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
