Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Bank of Northern Michigan, The v. Straitsland Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
Bank of Northern Michigan, The
Defendant:
Straitsland Corporation, Randall S. Sagante, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc., an Indiana Corporation et al
as 1:2011dp20091
Plaintiff:
Marlene B Tuttle
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elizabeth Goodwin, et al v. City of Painesville et al
as 1:2010cv02883
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Goodwin and Rebecca Carlucci
Defendant:
City of Painesville , Roberto Soto , William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. State of Ohio Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 3:2010cv02794
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Tuttle
Defendant:
State of Ohio Dept. of Public Safety, Duke LNU and City of Cleveland Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Tuttle, II v. Carroll County Detention Cente, et al
as 10-5693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES GILBERT TUTTLE, II
Defendant - Appellee:
CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MIKE HUMPHREY, Jailer and HENSLEY, Deputy
Tuttle v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P.
as 2:2010cv12001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tuttle
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tuttle v. Land et al
as 2:2010cv11221
Plaintiff:
Robert C. J. Tuttle
Defendant:
Terri Lynn Land and Michael Fildey
Tuttle v. Carroll County Detention Center et al
as 3:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Gilbert Tuttle, II
Defendant:
Carroll County Detention Center, Mike Humphrey and Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
