Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Frazier et al v. Dineequity, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv12125
Plaintiff:
Lisa Frazier , Leena Alfakir , Michael Quick and others
Defendant:
Dineequity, INC. and Applebee's Restaurants Mid-Atlantic LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: George Baveli
as 13-8015
Debtor:
In re: GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Defendant - Appellant:
TED DOUKAS, NEMESIS OF L.I. CORP., QUICK CAPITAL OF L.I. CORP. and others
Defendant:
JOHN M. STRAVATO, MAHAMMAD QURESHI, MAQ MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Eastman Outdoors, Inc. v. Quick-Sav Foods, Ltd.
as 4:2012cv15090
Plaintiff:
Eastman Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Quick -Sav Foods, Ltd
Tabata USA, Inc. v Quick,et al
as 1:2012cv00284
Garnishee:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Tabata USA, Inc.
Defendant:
James L Quick, Jr. and Brenda K Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Quick Fuel Technology et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Quick Fuel Technology and Marvin V. Benoit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNary et al v. Quick Enterprises, Inc. of Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
Kathryn McNary and Douglas McNary
Defendant:
Quick Enterprises, Inc. of Illinois and Lech Rataj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rama v. Beydoun et al
as 1:2012cv00264
Defendant:
Raed Al Beydoun and Big Rays Quick Lube Grand Rapids, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clayton Rama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
