Cases 71 - 80 of 2,465
Williams v. Core Civic, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Devon C. Williams
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Acting Warden Misty Mackey, Sgt. fnu Wygant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chattanoogie, LLC v. Hernandez Roofing & Construction of Dalton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Chattanoogie, LLC
Defendant:
Hernandez Roofing & Construction of Dalton, LLC, Victor Hernandez, Dalton Total Property Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alford RobinsonIn re: Alford Robinson
as 23-6061
Petitioner:
In re: ALFORD ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robinson v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, D. Ditzler, C. Righettetti-Rimedio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Adult & Teen Challenge et al.
as 4:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendant:
Adult & Teen Challenge, Joey Vorheez, Bob Pavlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Pann v. Brian Hadden, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PANN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HADDEN, KAYLA JOHNSON, K. CHAUVEZ and others
Thompson et al v. Thompson
as 2:2023cv12867
Plaintiff:
Christine Thompson and Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Thompson and Zanita Clipper
USA v. Ransom Robinson
as 23-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANSOM TAE-RICK ROBINSON
Robinson v. American Leather Operations, LLC
as 3:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robinson
Defendant:
American Leather Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
