Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 3:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
William Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. David Johnson
as 09-1758
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL JOHNSON
Michael Johnson v. Willie Smith
as 09-1748
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden
USA v. Michael Johnson
as 09-5658
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Johnson #392580 v. McKee
as 1:2009cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Johnson #392580
Respondent:
Kenneth T. McKee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 1:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Johnson v. Metropolitan Government of Nas, et al
as 07-6261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE and JOHN STORMENT, Officer
Johnson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2007cv00888
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States of America et al v. Land in Williamson County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter et al
as 3:2007cv00066
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant:
Land in Williamson County, Tennessee, a temporary right to enter, Michael Johnson and Amy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
