Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Felzke v. Nida et al
as 1:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Linda Felzke
Defendant:
Robert Nida and Timothy McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McMahon v. Friendship Home Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ava McMahon
Defendant:
Friendship Home Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Velasco , Georgia Lou Payne , Rodney Penland and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Astrazeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donnita Carmichael v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 12-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNITA CARMICHAEL, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Deceased Tonia Carmichael
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Baker v. Noronha et al
as 2:2012cv10642
Plaintiff:
Joseph Baker
Defendant:
Anita Noronha, Jane Doe, L Abel and others
McMahon, et al. v. Brazel, et al.
as 3:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Carolyn H. McMahon and Robert H. McMahon
Defendant:
James A. Brazell and Edward O. Oswald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gresham #272603 et al v. Mutschler et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603 and Ralph Proctor #297924
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Mutschler, P. Johns, Kristi Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22810
Plaintiff:
Geraldine McMahon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramsey #571624 v. McMahon et al
as 2:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
John Ramsey #571624, II
Defendant:
Melissa LaPlaunt, Kevin Rourk, Greg McQuiggin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
