Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Robinson v. Calvert, County of et al
as 1:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Calvert, County of and Mike Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2009cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Gene Wriggelsworth, Robert N. Jones and P.T.S. of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2009cv00231
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Robinson
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Rae Lea Troutner, Maryland, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Villicana, Jr. v. Blaine Lafler
as 09-1267
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY VILLICANA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAINE C. LAFLER, Warden
Robinson v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. et al
as 1:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rae Lea Troutner, Maryland, State of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. James B. Haggin Memorial Hospital
as 5:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Smith
Defendant:
James B. Haggin Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray King
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McClure et al v. D.H. Transportation et al
as 2:2008cv00352
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray McClure and Elizabeth Ann McClure
Defendant:
D.H. Transportation, D.H. Transportation, Billy West and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Michael Smith v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
as 08-5125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
