Cases 71 - 80 of 832
Perez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
Ralph Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03169
Plaintiff:
Maricel Perez
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia-Perez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03075
Plaintiff:
Carri Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramjet Aviation, Inc. et al v. My Parts Locator, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Ramjet Aviation, Inc., Skyways Charter, LLC and HT Aviation Corporation
Defendant:
My Parts Locator, Inc., Michelle Moore, Cody Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Perez v. Weaver et al
as 5:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Adrian Perez
Defendant:
McKee, KY City of and James Randall Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Weaver et al
as 6:2022cv00127
Counter Defendant:
Adrian Perez
Counter Claimant:
McKee, KY City of and James Randall Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez #230341 v. Braman et al
as 1:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Peter Alfred Perez #230341
Defendant:
Unknown Braman and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv11265
Plaintiff:
Louis Perez
Defendant:
John Doe and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Melendez-Perez v. USA
as 1:2022cv00916
Petitioner:
Cesar Francisco Melendez-Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
