Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Reece v. Tennessee, State of
as 3:2016cv00038
Petitioner:
James Reece
Respondent:
Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reece v. Chambrel at Montrose-Brookdale
as 5:2015cv02117
Defendant:
Chambrel at Montrose-Brookdale
Plaintiff:
J Christopher Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reece v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Danny Reece
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC , UC Health, LLC , Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
L. Ray Whitley, Chris Vines, The City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Johnson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
George P Ford
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Department and Mike Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2014cv02009
Plaintiff:
Sara L. Roberts , Robin Thomas , Michael Lowery and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tracy Eiswert, et al v. USA
as 14-6125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY LYNN REECE EISWERT, in her own right, as administratrix of the estate of Scott Walter Eiswert, deceased and on behalf of her minor children, U. E. and B. E. Eiswert and CHRISTINA REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Allen Electric, Inc. v. Reece-Campbell, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02691
Plaintiff:
Allen Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
Reece-Campbell, Inc. and DEEM, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Reece v. John Wootten, Jr., et al
as 14-6011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN D. WOOTTEN, JR., TOM E. GRAY, HENRY STEWARD and others
EASLEY v. REECE et al
as 2:2014cv01206
Plaintiff:
ANDRE W. EASLEY
Defendant:
Guy Reece and VALERIE B. SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
