Cases 71 - 80 of 1,318
Mitchell et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Morgan Mitchell and Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Funk v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Funk
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gentry v. Wal Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Trenisha Gentry
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emma Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 23-6044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMA COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, dba Wal-Mart No. 2548, STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and C & C DOORS, LLC
Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 6:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rogers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Greathouse v. Wal-Mart Store East, LP
as 7:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Greathouse
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Simms v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv12940
Plaintiff:
Robert Simms
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Deyoung v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2023cv00269
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Allyson Deyoung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nixon v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv12926
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Nixon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
