Cases 81 - 90 of 838
Michael Gorbe, et al v. City of Lathrup Village, MI, et al
as 21-1532
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, SCOTT MCKEE and CITY OF LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON RUCKER and MICHAEL GORBE
Alf et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2021cv02542
Plaintiff:
Michael Alf, Allan Novakowski, Chris Armstrong and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
as 0:2021cv00047
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Jasper Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02532
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gail Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Housewright v. Young et al
as 2:2021cv10732
Defendant:
Officer Zuk, Detective Kevin Bailey, Officer Phillip Young and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Lee Housewright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
French et al v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Armstrong Relocation Co., Inc. - Raleigh, North Carolina, James Richardson and United Van Lines, LLC
Plaintiff:
Connie French, Community First Trust Company and Robert French
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01933
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Armstrong and GW Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Cpl. Wialliam Mosley, Sgt. Smith, Nurse Carmen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilford v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Armstrong, Christopher King and Armstrong Utilities Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marsha Gilford doing business as Marsha Gilford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
