Cases 81 - 90 of 459
McCoy et al v. United Seating & Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Carr Access, Inc, United Seating and Mobility, LLC doing business as Numotion, Covenant Health and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward McCoy, Jr and Sarah Mccoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Hall
as 1:2021cv01033
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 21-1134
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, [UNKNOWN] CURRY, Detroit Police CAT Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carr v. Burke et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Defendant:
Judge Anne Haynie, Michael J. O'Connell, Commonwealth Metro Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department, Joy L. William, Benjamin Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. LMDC
as 3:2021cv00017
Respondent:
LMDC
Petitioner:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carr v. Beshear et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Defendant:
Greg Fischer, Andy Beshear and Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sound Inpatient Phys., Inc., et al v. T. M. Carr
as 20-6440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.D. ROBERT A. BESSLER and SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS, INC.
Intervenor:
THE COMMERCIAL APPEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
M.D. T.M. CARR and M.D. T. M. CARR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
