Cases 81 - 90 of 918
Johnson v. Day et al
as 2:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Diane Johnson
Defendant:
Donnie Day, Morgan Styles, Cole Piatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott et al v. Krape Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
Seth Cole Elliott, Cody Painter and Lonnie Jordan
Defendant:
Krape Logistics, Inc., Brian Krape and Stephanie Krape
Hall #600792 v. Cole et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Freddie Hall #600792
Defendant:
D. Cole, Peggy Erickson and Unknown Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLES et al v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
RECINA COLES and TONY COLES, II
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc., INSTANT BRANDS, LLC and INSTANT BRANDS HOLDINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cole v. Solon Pointe at Emerald Ridge, LLC
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Vanity Cole
Defendant:
Solon Pointe at Emerald Ridge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hill v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Ross, F/N/U Steward, F/N/U Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Cole, Jr v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
John Cole, Jr
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cole et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04330
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Cole and Virginia Cole
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
