Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Natalie Clark v. Nick Roccanova, et al
as 14-5467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATALIE CLARK
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
NICK ROCCANOVA
Defendant:
MICHAEL RUDY, JACK LYNCH, BO SHAMBURGER and others
PegaSync Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2014mc50440
Petitioner:
PegaSync Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Rudy Patros
Rudy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rudy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. LDV, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00187
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America
Defendant:
LDV, INC. , Celocar, LLC , Govco, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones #364868 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roosevelt Jones #364868
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Paul Eyke, Mandi Salmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund et al v. Ace Steel Erection Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv14097
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund , Iron Workers Health Fund of Eastern Michigan , Iron Workers Local 25 Vacation Pay Fund and others
Defendant:
Ace Steel Erection Incorporated and Rudy J. Pou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Rudy Tucker v. Bonita Hoffner
as 13-2191
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDY TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
BONITA J. HOFFNER
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #207829 v. Hoffner
as 1:2013cv00625
Petitioner:
Rudy Tucker #207829
Respondent:
Bonita J. Hoffner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
