Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Robert Bradford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 14-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC, TOBIE GRIFFIN and BUFFALOE & ASSOCIATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Looney v. Meyer et al
as 2:2014cv10854
Plaintiff:
Ben Looney
Defendant:
Heidi Meyer and Toby Cox
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Bushman et al v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv10011
Defendant:
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company , Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company , First American Title Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Brad J. Bushman , Tamara R. Stafford , Ryan Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simons v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01266
Plaintiff:
Toby Simons
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coach, Inc. et al v. Toby's Grocery et al
as 6:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Toby's Grocery, Melissa Brooke Sizemore, Melissa Brooke Grubb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Weaver v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2013cv01123
Plaintiff:
Toby Weaver
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Sheldon
as 5:2013cv01217
Petitioner:
Toby Dee Brown
Respondent:
Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Toby Bequette
as 13-5394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DEAN BEQUETTE
Tillman v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Tillman
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC, Morgan & Pottinger, PSC and Tobie Griffin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
