Cases 81 - 90 of 58,333
DiMambro v. Howard
as 2:2024cv11419
Petitioner:
Ronald Anthony DiMambro, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Eastern District, People of and Jeffrey Howard
United States of America v. $18,914.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$18,914.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Reese v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02206
Petitioner:
Erik Reese
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mims v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00552
Petitioner:
Tommy Terrell Mims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-3450
Petitioner:
OHIO CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Daniel Rogerson-Wise
as 24-3446
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL R. ROGERSON-WISE
West Bend Insurance Company v. United States of America Chess Federation et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
West Bend Insurance Company and West Bend Mutual Insurance Co.
Defendant:
United States of America Chess Federation and Randy Bauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
United States of America v. Feiler
as 2:2024mc50695
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Justin Feiler
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sandra Williams and Gregory Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
