Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Harris #440974 v. Singerling et al
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dejuan Harris #440974
Defendant:
Nicholas Singerling and Shane Hoag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Stone Treasures, LTD, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11389
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stone Treasures, LTD, LLC, Steve Hamade and Lorenzo Gonzalez-Heurerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lorenzo HarrisonIn re: Lorenzo Harrison
as 24-3440
Petitioner:
In re: LORENZO HARRISON
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK
USA v. Lorenzo Wilson
as 24-5471
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coronel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Coronel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lorenzo Wilson v. Brandon Robinson, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Defendant:
BRANDON ROBINSON, BRIAN DAVID GOULDY, DERRICK DAUGHERTY and others
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 6:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Crump et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$808.00 in United States Currency, $2,191.00 in United States Currency, $8,200.00 in United States Currency and others
Claimant:
Carlos Crump, Jereika Young, Roy Lee Johnson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Lorenzo Wilson
as 23-6076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
