Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Uhrig v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dustin Uhrig
Defendant:
Trooper C Johnson, Tropper William Howard, Stacey Sanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03082
Plaintiff:
Devin C. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
Tanisha C. Johnson
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Okonski v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Okonski, Stephanie Clark, Eduardo Barbosa and others
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Johnson
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Stephanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Silverdale Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Henry C Johnson
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center, Captain Knight, Detective Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Haas
as 4:2023cv11366
Petitioner:
Ronald C. Johnson
Respondent:
Randall Haas and Willis Chapman
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Johnson
Defendant:
Ernest Lewis, John Artrip, Officer Garrett Groesbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Johnson v. May
as 3:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Keevon C. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
