Cases 1 - 10 of 19,495
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Robert A. Benson, David G. Kamm and others
People of the State of Michigan v. Keely
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Brian William Keely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Kale et al v. Battle Creek Pizza, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Andrija Kale, Jordan Smith, Brian Hire and others
Defendant:
Battle Creek Pizza, Inc., KB Pizza, Co and Kevin Hershock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Priddy v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv03555
Defendant:
William Priddy, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ingrum v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ingrum
Defendant:
Martin V. Williams, Singidunum Equipment, LLC and Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Henning et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jordan M. Henning and John T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
DeNike v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
William A. DeNike
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: William Johnson
as 24-5590
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mark Chapman, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
