Cases 1 - 10 of 379
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02759
Plaintiff:
Ronald Holloway
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holloway v. Meltebarger et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Travis C Holloway
Defendant:
Jeremy Meltebarger, Stella Hoffman and Union County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Korecz et al.
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Case Holloway
Defendant:
Police Officer Korecz, Police Officer Young, Police Officer Chesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Holloway et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Terrence Holloway
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Almasy, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al.
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Patricia Almasy, Nina Aquino, Raeann Bankston and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Oxy Vinyls, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Darnell Holloway v. Stephen Noffsinger, et al
as 24-3122
Plaintiff:
DARNELL HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. NOFFSINGER, M.D. and JAYE N. SCHLACHET
Daramis Sharkey v. James Holloway
as 24-5145
Petitioner:
DARAMIS LEE SHARKEY
Respondent:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
