Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Bonds v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
Brandon Bonds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Todd Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools, et al
as 24-3283
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
DANIEL SNIVLEY, Athletic Director, Individually, LEAH ARMSTRONG, Case Worker, Individually and BERNE UNION LOCAL SCHOOLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. McCalister et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Darnell Moore
Defendant:
Robin McCalister, Delvin Nielsen, Dylan Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02124
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant:
Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moody et al v. Gartha et al
as 2:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody and Tracey Moody
Defendant:
Russell Charles Gartha, Harrison Ray Higgins, City of Southfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bond v. Carter Express, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bond
Defendant:
Carter Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
