Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Pickett, Jr. v. Randee Rewerts
as 23-1229
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD PICKETT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Anderson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD ANDERSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles Pickett, Jr. v. Randee Rewerts
as 23-1166
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD PICKETT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS
Pickett #485575 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Pickett #485575, Jr.
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skipp v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00859
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Skipp
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
L.A., et. al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv12050
Defendant:
United States of America, W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Charles Edward Rollison, DO and others
Plaintiff:
L. A., Kiersten Reeser and Jeremy Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
A et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv11317
Defendant:
W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Alma Garlo, MD, Monica Hill, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong, Kiersten Reeser and L A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
