Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Kevin Tolliver v. Jeff Noble, et al
as 23-4035
Plaintiff:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
WARDEN JEFF NOBLE, STANLEY TAYLOR, INVESTIGATOR MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
Knight et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
William Knight, Eric Smith, Mark Coleman and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cahill v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cahill
Defendant:
Memorial Heart Institute, LLC doing business as The Chattanooga Heart Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Charles Cahill v. Randee Rewerts
as 22-1525
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES CAHILL
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS
Kevin Tolliver v. Keith Foley, et al
as 22-3382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden, STANLEY TAYLOR, MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
Nicholas Nutter, et al v. The Ohio State University
as 21-3982
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS NUTTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC SMITH, MARK COLEMAN, WILLIAM KNIGHT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Cahill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01253
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jill Cahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Tolliver v. Keith Foley, et al
as 21-3250
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUL RAHMAN SHAHID, ROCHELLE MOORE, KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Daniel Cobble v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-5250
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY BETH CAHILL, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, ANDY BESHEAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBBLE
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Daniel Cobble v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-5249
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY BETH CAHILL, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, ANDY BESHEAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBBLE
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
