Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Cargile v. Meeks et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shane Cargile
Defendant:
Isaac Meeks and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cargill v. Warden Healy
as 4:2023cv01755
Petitioner:
Tammeco A. Cargill
Respondent:
Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nathaniel Cargill v. USA
as 23-3055
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHANIEL EUGENE CARGILL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Polgar v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 2:2022cv13094
Plaintiff:
Lynn M. Polgar
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation a/k/a Cargill Protein, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cargill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04004
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Cargill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bird v. Cargill, Incorporated
as 1:2022cv02035
Plaintiff:
David Bird
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Cargill v. USA
as 5:2022cv01572
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Eugene Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mark Hoeltzel v. Margie Pillsbury, et al
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGIE PILLSBURY, Detective, MAUREEN BURKE, Officer, JANET MARTIN-CONNORS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
