Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ashley #136985 v. Coe et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Carl Ashley #136985
Defendant:
E'Coe Hill, Heather Doolittle, Jacob Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beier v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Glenn Beier, Kim Woolums, Heather Rapp and others
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC, University Of Cincinnati Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Physicians Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barker et al v. Stark County, Ohio
as 5:2019cv00276
Plaintiff:
Deanna Clapper and Christy Barker
Defendant:
Stark County, Ohio and George T. Maier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 17-4056
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER, et al
Appellant:
BRENT L. ENGLISH
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Clapper v. USF Holland, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14045
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clapper
Defendant:
USF Holland, Inc. and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 16-4231
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRUNO
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and JAMES MYERS
David Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc.
as 16-3206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Defendant - Appellant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 15-4386
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER, et al.
Appellant:
BRENT L. ENGLISH
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
David Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 14-3770
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Appellant:
DAVID BRUNO
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and JAMES MYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
