Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brooks et al v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Shontel Brown, Board of Commissions Cuyahoga County, Metro Health Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Shone Trawick, Jr., Dalonte Brooks-Trawick, Dionne Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rhodes v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
Paul Dale Miller and RG Transport LLC
Plaintiff:
Charity V Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe #751938 v. Miller
as 1:2015cv00451
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Joe #751938
Respondent:
Dale Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe #751938 v. Miller
as 1:2015cv00175
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Joe #751938
Respondent:
Dale Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22949
Plaintiff:
Dale Miller and Neva Miller
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cummings v. Hoskins et al
as 1:2010cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Cummings
Defendant:
William Hoskins, Dale Miller, Michael D. Seinen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Miller #215071 v. Miller
as 1:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kerry Dale Miller #215071
Defendant:
Kenneth A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Miller
as 2:2009cv12489
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ellen Dale Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection
Type:
Contract
Brinkman et al v. Budish et al
as 1:2009cv00326
Petitioner:
Thomas E Brinkman, Jr
Plaintiff:
Coalition Opposed To Additional Spending & Taxes and Mark W Miller
Defendant:
Armond D Budish, Bill Harris, William Batchelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bussell v. Ionia, County of et al
as 1:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Candi Bussell
Defendant:
Ionia, County of, Dwain Dennis, Dale Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
