Cases 1 - 10 of 618
Jenkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Dustin D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hughes v. Washington County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lynn hughes
Defendant:
Washington County Sheriffs Department, Foister, Travis Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. City of Frankfort et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Myers
Defendant:
City of Frankfort, Dustin Bowman and Larry G. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dustin Young v. John Swaney, et al
as 24-3394
Petitioner:
DUSTIN YOUNG
Respondent:
JOHN R. SWANEY, Madison County Sheriff and BUTLER COUNTY, OH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Jones v. Nationwide Cargo, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Nationwide Cargo, Inc. and Dustin Singhas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stone v. USA
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Dustin R. Stone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martha England, et al v. DENSO International America Inc., et al
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
MARTHA D. ENGLAND, DUSTIN M. MARTIN and JOSEPHINE THOMAS
Defendant:
DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC., SEIJI MAEDA and others
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dustin Hawkins v. Noah Nagy
as 24-1285
Petitioner:
DUSTIN JAMES HAWKINS
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden and NOAH NAGY, Warden
Hardiman v. McConnell et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cory Dustin Hardiman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joyce McConnell, Vicky Afisov, Sandy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
