Cases 1 - 10 of 797
Martin v. Poulin et al
as 1:2024cv01340
Defendant:
Lucy Jones and Michael J. Poulin
Plaintiff:
Ernest Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarrett et al v. Archibald
as 2:2024cv13223
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Jarrett P.C. and Ernest L. Jarrett
Defendant:
Dominic Archibald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
McCloude v. USA
as 5:2024cv01979
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ernest L. McCloude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henry Jones v. Tony Mays, et al
as 24-5966
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE JONES
Defendant:
JESSIA CALOWELL, TERRY FOSTER, Security/Officer, JAMIE A. DAVIS, Corporal/Security and others
Nathanael Nolt, et al v. Zachary Knowles, et al
as 24-5872
Petitioner:
COREY LEA and NATHANAEL NOLT
Respondent:
ZK RANCHES, LLC, ZACHARY KNOWLES, ELWOOD YODER, aka Riverside Labor Group, LLC, aka Fairview Custom Meats and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03840
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ernest Ellis v. Board for Correction of Naval Records
as 24-3662
Plaintiff:
ERNEST RALPH ELLIS, SR.
Defendant:
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Zank Payment Processing, Inc. v. Custom Payment Consulting, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Zank Payment Processing, Inc.
Defendant:
Ernest Hofferbert, Custom Payment Consulting, Inc., Universal Payment Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
O'Bryan v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Blake O'Bryan
Defendant:
Ernest Bradely Moore and Washington County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerry Aldridge, et al v. Regions Bank
as 24-5603
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWN, MARGUERITE DUFFY, EDNA T. CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
REGIONS BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
