Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fernando Larrea v. Unlimited Technology Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01653
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Unlimited Technology Systems LLC
Plaintiff:
Fernando Larrea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03547
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03133
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03128
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 3:2026cv01068
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 2:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv02177
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
