Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jones v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01126
Defendant:
Waynard Winbush, FNU Garr, FNU Walton and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Tate et al
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Mullins
Defendant:
Danny Tate, Margie Hays, Tiffany Garr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Clark, et al v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, et al
as 24-5061
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DEWAYNE CLARK and GARR KEITH HARDIN
Defendant:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT and ROBERT THURMAN, Kentucky State Police Crime Lab Forensic Serologist, in his individual capacity
Jones v. John Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Watwood, Assistant Warden Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
General Star Indemnity Company v. Louisville Area Governmental Self Insurance Trust et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, James W. Griffiths and others
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Garr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01673
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wilma Garr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardin v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Meade County and others
Plaintiff:
Garr Keith Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
