Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Michael Hoskins v. USA
as 23-4004
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HOSKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harrison v. Arnold et al
as 0:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Krystal Arnold, Zachary R. Parsons, P.A. Gregory Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Amanda Hoskins, et al v. Jason York, et al
as 23-5325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA HOSKINS and JONATHAN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON YORK, Kentucky State Police Officer, Individually, KNOX COUNTY, KY, MIKE BROUGHTON, Barbourville Police Officer, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hoskins v. USA
as 1:2023cv00131
Petitioner:
Michael Hoskins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Davonte Hoskins
as 22-1552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVONTE RAYSHAD HOSKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
