Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Weaver v. Doerflien et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mykell Weaver
Defendant:
Lt Dean Doerflien, Sgt William Hane, P.O. Andrew Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell et al v. A&H Used Cars Inc.
as 5:2023cv12862
Plaintiff:
Hanee Mitchell and Alexis Coffey
Defendant:
A&H Used Cars Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Mayhan v. Belzar et al
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Mayhan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Belzar, Sheriff Russell L. Martin, Officer Deskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Busler et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Abigail Busler, Susanne Hanes, Carl Kirksey and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McDaniel v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03802
Plaintiff:
eric allen and shannon mcdaniel
Defendant:
ANNETE CHAMBERS-SMITH, JOSETTE oKEREKE, Lieutenant Unknown Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. House Holder et al
as 2:2022cv03741
Plaintiff:
Tremain Hogan
Defendant:
Corrections Officer House Holder and Corrections Officer Hanes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanes v. Gore et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Nicholas Gore and Annett Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Hanes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerry Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hanes Jerry Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv05918
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Haning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hanes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01650
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deloris Hanes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
