Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11455
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Angela Brown
as 24-5510
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANGELA NICOLE BROWN, aka Nikki Henry
Leca v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02652
Plaintiff: Henry Leca
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henry v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02578
Plaintiff: Gary Henry
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Plaintiff: Henry Hopkins and Ebony Smith
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner: Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent: Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner: Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent: State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bennett v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02242
Plaintiff: Robert Henry Bennett
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Herbert May
Defendant: Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?