Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Powell v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Powell
Defendant:
Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UNUM Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Modlin v. The Powell Law Group, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Mark Modlin
Defendant:
The Powell Law Group, P.C. and Robert J. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv02120
Petitioner:
Jonathan J. Powell
Respondent:
Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
Alysan J. Powell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Walmart Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cervetto v. Powell et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Cervetto
Defendant:
Mark J. Powell and Transervice Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Klemis, M.D. et al
as 2:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Shirley Holmes
Defendant:
James E. Klemis, M.D., The Stern Cardiovascular Center, P.A., Timothy J. Powell, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv10249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard et al v. Darke County Children Services et al
as 3:2009cv00352
Plaintiff:
Corbin J Howard, I and Emily R Howard
Defendant:
Darke County Children Services, Franklin County Children Services, Montgomery County Children Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
