Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Jason Maxedon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Labor Litigation
Kelly v. Family Health Services of Erie County
as 3:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
Family Health Services of Erie County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kelly v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 6:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston , Consol Energy, Inc., Consol Energy, Inc. Flexible Benefits Program Long Term Disability (LTD) Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McFarland v. USA
as 5:2015cv00255
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Kelly McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Durham v. Moore et al
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Durham, Jr.
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Gary C Mohr, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Kelly et al
as 0:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tammy Kelly, James Kelly, NCO Portfolio Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Humes et al v. Blue Ash City of et al
as 1:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
Jevon T. Humes and Ayisha R. Humes
Defendant:
Blue Ash City of , Chris Wallace , Robert Gerhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv14235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gugin v. Crawford, County of et al,
as 2:2011cv12222
Defendant:
Crawford, County of , Kirk A. Wakefield , James Golnick and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gugin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
