Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James Hayes v. Kevin Perkins
as 23-5678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES BRADLEY HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN PERKINS, in his individual and official capacities
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
James Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sherriff Office and State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
William James Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10172
Plaintiff:
Kathy McCree, Margo Carpenter, Vernita Coleman and others
Defendant:
Michael Prysby, Leo A. Daly Company, Rowe Professional Services Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Combs
as 19-5943
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES BRADLEY COMBS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stewart v. Christian County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Antonio G. Stewart
Defendant:
Christian County Jail, Adam Wayne Ellison, James Bradley Hageman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckles v. Jensen et al
as 3:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Buckles
Defendant:
Stacy Jensen and Danny Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. USA
as 2:2017cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Bradley Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Does et al
as 3:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Edwin Lewis v. Mildred Smoker, et al
as 14-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN DUANE LEWIS, named on initiating document as Edwin Duane Lewis #227535
Defendant - Appellee:
MILDRED SMOKER, RUO, JAMES BRADLEY, ARUS, WARREN LINK, RUM (retired) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
