Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Johnson et al v. Regents of the University of Michigan
as 2:2020cv12377
Plaintiff:
John Doe RS-41, John Doe RS-51, John Doe RS-56 and others
Defendant:
Regents of the University of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02178
Plaintiff:
Shirley Walker
Defendant:
Tony Parker, FNU Gatewood, Johnny Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01337
Plaintiff:
Shirley Walker
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Internal Affairs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2016cv10458
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Johnny Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Turner v. Claiborne County et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00207
Defendant:
Claiborne County , David Ray , Jason Henegar and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Springsteen v. Garrett et al
as 2:2011cv11743
Plaintiff:
David Springsteen
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett, Wayne, County of, Lynn M. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2009cv00317
Plaintiff:
Johnny Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
