Cases 1 - 10 of 3,285
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copas et al v. Sackett et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
James M. Copas, Daniel J. Hartman, Rodney Halcomb and others
Defendant:
Kelly Sackett and Kalamazoo County Republican Committee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kent-Parcell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kent-Parcell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wheeler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Kelly Wheeler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bellue v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bellue
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bratcher v. Unum Provident Insurance Co.
as 3:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Unum Provident Insurance Co. and Unum Appeals Unit
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
VRA Accounting Services, LLC v. Wellspring Nurse Source, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11298
Plaintiff:
VRA ACCOUNTING SERVICES, LLC d/b/a AYAR ACCOUNTING
Defendant:
WELLSPRING NURSE SOURCE, LLC and KELLY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kelly v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
April Michelle Kelly
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
