Cases 1 - 10 of 352
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Bing et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Richard Kenny Woodson
Defendant:
Christy Bing, Kayla McBride, William R. Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eyes Sr. et al v. VLL Properties et al (JRG3)
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Eyes Sr., Michael Eyes Jr. and Katherine Eyes
Defendant:
VLL Properties, Virginia L. Lewis and Kenny R. Harp
Agness McCurry v. Travis McDonough, et al
as 23-6055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, Judge, KENNY W. ARMSTRONG, Judge, ANDY D. BENNETT, Judge and others
Kenny v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12588
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kenny
Defendant:
Heidi E Washington, Keller, Beyer and others
McCurry v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Travis McDonough, Kenny Armstrong, Andy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kenny et al v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv12589
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kenny and Zaine Teeple
Defendant:
Sherman Campbell, L. McRoberts, Lawson and others
Lai Cheong v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Kenny Lai Cheong
Respondent:
RealPage Inc, Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC, Lincoln Property Company and others
Defendant:
Pinnacle Property Management Services, LLC
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
