Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Howell et al v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Cecil E. Howell and Debra L. Howell
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc., Fastbuy Inc., State of Ohio, Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Howell v. Field Management Group LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00190
Defendant:
FIELD MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, A M COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. and AM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. HOWELL, III
Bond et al v. Howell et al
as 1:2020cv00352
Defendant:
Paul L. Howell, A/T Transportation, LLC and Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins. Co.
Plaintiff:
Donna W. Bond, Keven S. Bond and Addison S. Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrienne Howell v. Father Maloney's Boys' Haven, et al
as 20-5122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIENNE L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, Commonwealth of Kentucky, ROBERT BROWN LESTER, VICKIE YATES BROWN GLISSON, Individually and in her official capacity as Former Secretary of Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Bobby Ojose v. Youngstown State University, et al
as 19-3221
Defendant:
YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR CHARLES L. HOWELL, DOCTOR MARTIN A. ABRAHAM, CYNTHIA A. KRAVITZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOCTOR BOBBY OJOSE
Howell v. Father Maloney's Boys' Haven, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Adrienne L. Howell
Defendant:
Father Maloney's Boys' Haven, Inc. , Jeff Hadley , Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sam Howell v. USA
as 15-5358
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAM L. HOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Bobby Williamson
as 12-6252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BOBBY WILLIAMSON, aka Danny L. Howell
United States of America v. Howell
as 3:2013cv00157
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Michael L Howell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
