Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ricky Stewart, III v. USA
as 22-6060
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY LEE STEWART, III
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stewart v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01234
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ricky Stewart, IIIIn re: Ricky Stewart, III
as 20-5628
Petitioner:
In re: RICKY LEE STEWART, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stewart v. Harltley
as 5:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Stewart, III
Defendant:
Jaquelyn Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Ross County,Ohio/Board of Ross County Commissioners et al
as 2:2015cv00777
Plaintiff:
Loral Lee Stewart
Defendant:
Ross County,Ohio/Board of Ross County Commissioners , George W. Lavender, Jr. , T.J. Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salley et al v. Manning et al
as 2:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Salley , Daniel E. Whitaker , Scott Daniel Mendenhall and others
Defendant:
Bobbie Manning and Sullivan County (Tennessee) Highway Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv11121
Plaintiff:
Joe Lee Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Peterson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20810
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Peterson and Nancy Lee Stewart
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Lavender, Jr. et al
as 2:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
James Lee Stewart
Defendant:
George Lavender, Jr. , Shawna Ott , Richard Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ronda Lee Stewart
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
