Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lewis Williams v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 19-1479
Defendant:
MELISSA HARTNAGEL, ARUS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, HUM and DARNELL STUART, Deputy Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS E. WILLIAMS
Lewis Williams v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 19-1215
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, HUM, DR. LARSEN, CHARLES S. JAMSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS E. WILLIAMS
Williams #140365 v. Cooper et al
as 1:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Lewis E. Williams #140365
Defendant:
Heather Cooper, Darnell Stuart, Melissa Hartnagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bernard Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Tara Dunn and XCentric Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 2:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bernard Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Tara Dunn and XCentric Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bernard Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Tara Dunn and XCentric Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015oe00627
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bernard Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Tara Dunn and XCentric Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv15299
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lewis F. Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 10-6289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
Gary Williams v. Lisa Sadler, et al
as 10-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA L. SADLER, MARK J. WODARCYK and LEWIS E. WILLIAMS, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
