Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Evans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04043
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Evans
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sompo America Insurance Company v. Evans et al
as 3:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Sompo America Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brenda Marie Evans and Devin Dewayne Sistrunck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00632
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mary Evans
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 6:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mary Evans
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Booker v. Evans et al
as 3:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
James A Booker
Defendant:
Mary Evans, Wendy M Genovese and James O Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Lane et al
as 3:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hall
Defendant:
Edmund Lane and Mary Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onders v. Kentucky State University et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Richard Onders
Defendant:
Kentucky State University , Mary Evans Sias and Harold R. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharon Evans v. Sir Pizza of Kentucky, Inc., et al
as 10-6098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON MARIE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
SIR PIZZA OF KENTUCKY, INC., BRIAN N. TAYLOR, RONNIE BASTIN, Chief and others
Defendant:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Division of Police
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
