Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Martin v. Hurst et al
as 2:2024cv11155
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin
Defendant:
Robert Hurst, Erane Washington, Rachel L. McDuffie and others
Crawford et al v. McKinley et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite, Alton Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., The United States Congress, The United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-106
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
Pipkin v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County Sheriff Department, Sgt. Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. McDuffie et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andrea Roberson Sims and United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
Mary McDuffie, John Collins and Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv12776
Plaintiff:
Minnie Bell Price and Ronald James Cooks
Defendant:
Kenyetta Stanford Johnson, Eric Decker Thomas, Dawn White and others
Davis v. Hoard et al
as 2:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Demitrious Davis
Defendant:
Rondle Hoard, M. McDuffy and Chris Sowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Toka McDuffie
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDuffie v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
William McDuffie
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
