Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 106
McFadden
as 2:2024mc50636
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv10897
Plaintiff: Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Keymon et al v. Kearcey et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff: Kyle Wayne Keymon and James Allen Franks
Defendant: Nathan Kearcey, Emma Gray, Amanda Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff: Andrea McFadden
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McFadden v. USA
as 3:2023cv00241
Petitioner: Jeremy K. McFadden
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00970
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Doe v. University of Michigan, et al
as 22-1654
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellant: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, PAMELA HEATLIE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?