Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Brian McElroy v. Zachary Ropos, et al
as 23-4037
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH MCELROY
Defendant:
ZACHARY ROPOS, Patrol Sergeant, Shield #50, FRANK J. LEONBRUNO, Sheriff, Shield #145 and CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OH
McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. v. Moultry et al
as 3:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
McElroy Truck Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Terrence Moultry, Lowes Home Centers LLC, Retail Direct, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McElroy v. Fresh Mark, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Antoine McElroy
Defendant:
Fresh Mark, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Jerome F. Weiss
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Galloway-Bey v. Gott et al (TV2)
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lamont Galloway-Bey
Defendant:
Christopher Gott, East Ridge Police Department, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElroy v. Ropos et al
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith McElroy
Defendant:
Patrol SGT Zachary Ropos, #145 Sheriff Frank LeonBruno and City of Painesville, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElroy v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Pamela McElroy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Justin McElroy v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3395
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN MCELROY
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
USA v. Charles McElroy
as 23-5413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES I. MCELROY
Brian McElroy v. City of Painesville, OH
as 23-3174
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH MCELROY
Respondent / Appellee:
CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
