Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stanfill #879012 v. Morford
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Stanfill #879012
Defendant:
Unknown Morford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Abizaid et al
as 1:2017cv00907
Defendant:
Thomas S. Gross, Bruce A. Carbonari, RPM International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis Wolfel v. Jane Farley-Morford
as 10-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. WOLFEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE FARLEY-MORFORD
Wynn v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2009cv00754
Plaintiff:
Ra Karrie Wynn
Defendant:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, Claggs and Morford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfel v. Farley-Morford
as 2:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Wolfel
Defendant:
Jane Farley-Morford
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sidney Lewis, et al v. Michael Holbrook, et al
as 08-3357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY TYLER LEWIS and YVONNE D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, Honorable Judge, MARC E. DANN, HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and others
Lewis et al v. The Honorable Judge Michael Holbrook et al
as 2:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Sidney T Lewis, Yvonne D. Lewis, Cassandra Henley and others
Defendant:
Michael Holbrook, Marc Dann, The Huntington National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels et al v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Valencia Daniels, Cassandra Hensley, Cassandra Henley and others
Defendant:
The State of Ohio, Franklin County, Richard C Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00717
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Mitchell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Alberto Gonzales and Craig S. Morford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
